Truth
exists because reality exists.
Consider
a person who drives to town, goes into a coffee shop and says to his friends, “That’s
quite a pothole north of town. I barely saw it, but I sure felt it!”
One
of his friends replies, “I just came to town that same way. I didn’t see any
pothole and I sure didn’t hit one. It was a smooth ride all the way for me.”
Did
the pothole exist for one person and not for the other?
It’s
hard to imagine anyone who would argue such a thing. More likely, there would
be a discussion of whether one person imagined a pothole or the other person
simply failed to see or hit it because of being on a slightly different track.
The
more practical question is the extent to which we can actually know the truth,
or to ask it somewhat differently, is our understanding of the truth true?
We
process reality through our senses: sight, touch, taste, smell and hearing. If
we had none of these senses, we would be absolutely cut off from the world
around us, unaware of even our own existence. As long as we have at least one
of them, however, and a functioning brain, we can process reality through the
filter of our experience.
Our
capacity to know the truth is shaped by our willingness to engage in critical
thinking and by the way in which our experience has conditioned us.
In
the same way, our capacity to be deceived is shaped by our unwillingness to
engage in critical thinking and by the way in which our experience has
conditioned us.
Discovering
the truth about a pothole is relatively simple: we can go and see for
ourselves, trusting our sense of sight and touch to confirm whether or not it
is there. If you live in Michigan, you have lots of experience to guide you in
this!
Discovering
other truth is more complex. For instance, has Obamacare been a success or a
disaster? Determining the truth of this would require a considerable amount of reliance
on trusted sources. This raises a bigger question: who can you trust to be truthful?
Discovering
religious truth is perhaps the most important – and the most complex – of all. There
will be more said on this in later blogs after we have looked into the nature of critical thinking and the way in which experience conditions us.
Please
note: any discussions on Obamacare resulting from this blog will be deleted. I
will be interested in discussing it in the future, but not until much more
groundwork has been laid and we can give it the attention a complicated matter
deserves.
I agree. John has a great perspective on this topic that has furthered my insight. He invited me to attend a class regarding Logic. Oh, how I wish I were near Monroe!!
ReplyDelete